The List of N Things
Paul Graham’s essay The List of N Things explains why the “7 Things…” format is popular—and what’s wrong with it.
Why Readers Prefer Lists
- Structure is explicit, eliminating mental work
- “Random access”—readers can skip sections without losing comprehension
- Points are independent, making the format “fault tolerant”
Advantages for Writers
The format protects against incomplete thinking, allows quick scaffolding, and eliminates the risk of “running out of ideas” mid-argument.
The Critical Weakness
“There’s so little room for new thought.” Since writers determine the title first, discoveries during composition remain confined to predetermined categories. This constrains genuine intellectual exploration.
On Education
The five-paragraph essay is actually a disguised list of n things. Making this explicit would be more honest than obscuring the format with artificial transitions.
My Takeaway
The format’s accessibility represents both democratization and intellectual limitation. Recognize when you’re using constrained thinking structures.
Do you use the “list of n things” format? I’d love to hear at persdre@gmail.com.